Ontario Personal Injury Lawyers
Call 1-888-404-5167
Preszler Injury Lawyers

Why Jury Trials Should Be Removed from Personal Injury Cases

Juries introduce a series of inefficiencies to our justice system. Those inefficiencies mean trials take longer and cost more than they would otherwise. Eliminating juries from civil trials would lead to significant savings in litigation costs, both to the parties and to the courts, and these savings could put downward pressure on insurance premiums.

Talk With Our Legal Team

If you have any questions and would like to schedule a call with our legal team for a FREE no-obligation consultation, contact us now. During this call you can ask any questions as it relates to your accident and/or claim and we'll discuss your options and possible outcomes.

Regardless of where you're located in Ontario – we may be able to help you. Don't delay - call us. Our lines are open 24/7.

The Role of Juries in Civil Lawsuits

Most people are at least somewhat familiar with what juries do thanks to films and television, but the specifics are not as well known.

In a lawsuit heard by a jury, the jury is the finder of fact. If the parties disagree about a fact, then the jury decides which party is right.

The jury’s role as fact-finder is different from the judge’s role in such cases. The judge’s role is to determine how the law applies in a case, both procedurally and substantively.

What some people may not realize, however, is that juries are not necessary in a civil lawsuit. Rather, the parties can choose to let the judge decide disputes of both law and fact. In that event, they present evidence and arguments only to the judge.

Call 1-888-608-2111 for available options or Book a Consultation

What’s wrong with juries?

Understanding that judges can serve the same fact-finding function as juries in civil lawsuits, we can now consider why judges are the better alternative: Juries are a source of inefficiency and increased costs in Ontario courts. For example:

  • Juries must be summoned, empaneled, and selected. Every year, some 180,000 Ontarians are called for jury duty from the jury roll established the previous year. Some of these individuals will then be selected to serve on a jury, and the lawyers in the case given the opportunity to challenge him or her.
  • Juries must be instructed. Jurors, by and large, do not know the law when they are selected for a jury. The judge and lawyers in a case must spend time educating the jurors on what the law says and how the evidence fits into it.
  • Juries may be fought over. Juries are just another procedural aspect of a lawsuit over which the lawyers may argue. For instance, if one party believes a case will be too complex for a jury, he or she may move to strike the jury. But the other party may believe that it is to his or her advantage to have the case heard by a jury, and so they will have to spend time arguing the question before the judge.

These inefficiencies and costs pose two problems in the context of auto-accident litigation. First, they increase costs for both plaintiffs and insurance companies. These increased costs must be offset by higher premiums. By eliminating jury trials and their attendant costs, we should see premiums fall, too.

Second, although insurance companies bear these increased costs, many nonetheless favour jury trials, because they can bear the costs more easily than individual plaintiffs. In other words, the higher costs associated with a jury are one-sided. They motivate plaintiffs to settle for less, more than they motivate insurance companies to settle for more.

Can we get rid of juries in civil lawsuits?

Juries are deeply rooted in English law and all its common-law descendants, having been guaranteed as early as Magna Carta in 1215. So, it may be fairly asked, can civil juries actually be eliminated in Ontario? We think so, for three primary reasons:

  • There is no constitutional right to juries in civil litigation. Although the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects the right to a jury in some criminal cases, this is not true of civil lawsuits.
  • Already, few disputes are decided by jury. The overwhelming majority of civil disputes these days are settled out of court. And even among those that are resolved in court, only a minority involve juries. This means that, already, juries decide only a tiny fraction of civil lawsuits.
  • Other jurisdictions prohibit civil jury trials. Several common-law jurisdictions have abolished civil jury trials, either in whole or in part. For instance, England itself no longer allows juries in personal-injury trials. Some parts of Australia have eliminated civil jury trials altogether.

No doubt, civil juries are an ancient and revered institution, but that does not mean that they still make sense in the modern world. Today, civil juries are rarely used, but when they are, they drive up costs for plaintiffs, courts, and the insurance system as a whole. If we are serious about reducing costs, and so reducing insurance premiums, it is time to seriously consider ending the practice of using juries in civil lawsuits in Ontario.

Injured in an accident? Seek Legal Help Today

If you were injured in an accident caused by someone else’s negligence, you deserve legal representation who can fight on behalf of your best interests before either a judge or a jury. To learn how our Ontario personal injury lawyers may be able to help you with your pursuit of justice, schedule a free initial consultation with Preszler Injury Lawyers today.

Fill out out our free online case evaluation form and get started on your journey to recovery.

related videos


Can I File An Injury Claim Without Insurance?

Communicating With Injury Clients

Does Insurance Really Watch People After They File Injury Claims?

How Our Lawyers Can Help With Your Injury Claim

How to File a Sports Injury Claim

Importance of Experience When Choosing An Injury Lawyer

Personal Injury Lawyers

Personal Injury Settlement Restrictions

Potential Impact of Social Media on a Personal Injury Claim

Pre-Existing Injuries and Their Impact on An Injury Settlement

Protecting Yourself From a Swimming Pool Accident

Safety Tips For Sending Your Child to Summer Camp

Seeking Help For Your Personal Injury

Steps to Take to Help My Injury Case

The Role of a Doctor in An Injury Claim

What is a Tort Claim?

What makes Preszler Law different?

What To Look For When Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer

Your Legal Rights During a Personal Injury Claim
Call us now at

151 Eglinton Ave W,
Toronto, ON
M4R 1A6
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
4145 N Service Rd
Burlington, ON
L7L 4X6
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
2 County Ct Blvd #400,
Brampton, ON
L6W 3W8
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
105 Consumers Drive
Whitby, ON
L1N 1C4
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
92 Caplan Ave #121,
Barrie, ON
L4N 0Z7
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
380 Wellington St Tower B, 6th Floor,
London, ON
N6A 5B5
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
2233 Argentia Rd Suite 302,
East Tower Mississauga, ON
L5N 6A6
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
1 Hunter St E,
Hamilton, ON
L8N 3W1
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
459 George St N,
Peterborough, ON
K9H 3R9
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
22 Frederick Street,
Suite 700
Kitchener, ON N2H 6M6
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
116 Lisgar Street, Suite 300
Ottawa ON
K2P 0C2
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
10 Milner Business Ct #300,
Scarborough, ON
M1B 3C6
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
*consultation offices

DISCLAIMER: Please be advised that the header image and other images throughout this website may include both lawyer and non-lawyer/paralegal employees of Preszler Injury Lawyers and DPJP Professional Corporation and unrelated third parties. Our spokesperson John Fraser, or any other non-lawyer/paralegals in our marketing is not to be construed in any way as misleading to the public. Our marketing efforts are not intended to suggest qualitative superiority to other lawyers, paralegals or law firms in any way. Any questions regarding the usage of non-lawyers in our legal marketing or otherwise can be directed to our management team. Please also note that past results are not indicative of future results and that each case is unique and that case results listed on site are from experiences across Canada and are not specific to any province. Please be advised that some of the content on this website may be out of date. None of the content is intended to act as legal advice as each situation is independent and unique and requires individual legal advice from a licensed lawyer or paralegal. For legal advice on your individual situation – we can provide legal guidance after you have contacted our firm and we have established a lawyer-client relationship contractually. Maximum contingency fee charged is 33%. Finally, our usage of awards and logos for awards does not suggest qualitative superiority to other lawyers, paralegals or law firms. All awards received from third party organizations have been done so through their own reasonable evaluative process and do not include any payment for these awards except for the use of the award logos for our marketing assets. We are also proud to service additional provinces like Alberta, British Columbia and Nova Scotia.