Ontario Personal Injury Lawyers
Call 1-888-404-5167
Preszler Injury Lawyers

Loss of Interdependency in Sexual Abuse Claims


Sexual abuse is an abuse of power. It is an assault of a sexual nature that violates the integrity of the perpetrator’s victim.

The act of sexual assault does not depend solely on contact with any specific part of someone’s body, but rather can include both touching and non-touching forms of abuse. Non-touching forms of sexual assault might include exposing the victim to pornography, voyeurism (i.e., watching the victim in a sexual way, either while clothed or unclothed), and exhibitionism.

The perpetrators of sexual assault, abuse, and harassment often rely on threats, blackmail, coercion, the use of force, and other deplorable tactics to take advantage of victims who are unable or unwilling to give their consent. This violation often immediately results in shock, fear, and disbelief.

While sexual abuse survivor’s experience and response to their assault is unique, many victims of this despicable crime often face similar psychological outcomes. Common responses to sexual victimization include:

  • Shame
  • Guilt
  • Denial
  • Minimizing behaviours
  • Trust issues
  • Self-isolation
  • Dissociation
  • Memory loss and other cognitive disorders
  • And others

The long-term effects of surviving sexual abuse can be all-encompassing, impacting all facets of an individual’s life. Many sexual abuse survivors develop serious mental health concerns, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). They may also experience other long-term reactions, including poor health, a sense of helplessness, persistent fear, mood swings, sleep disturbances, flashbacks, panic attacks, phobias, relationship difficulties, paranoia, localized pain, and suicidal ideation.

If you are in distress, contact Talk Suicide Canada by calling 1-833-456-4566.

For many reasons, including rampant social stigmatization and victim-blaming, most sexual assaults in Canada go unreported. According to the Government of Canada’s General Social Study on Victimization, 83% of the nation’s sexual assaults were not reported to police or other authorities. However, recent social phenomena – including the #MeToo Movement – have shone a spotlight on this societal issue, prompting legislative changes that may make it less frightening for victims to speak out against their abusers.

Talk With Our Legal Team



If you have any questions and would like to schedule a call with our legal team for a FREE no-obligation consultation, contact us now. During this call you can ask any questions as it relates to your accident and/or claim and we'll discuss your options and possible outcomes.

Regardless of where you're located in Ontario – we may be able to help you. Don't delay - call us. Our lines are open 24/7.

Loss of Interdependency 

Because of the trauma endured by the victims of sexual abuse, they may lose their ability to form and sustain interpersonal relationships. In Canada, victims of sexual abuse may, therefore, be entitled to damages related to a loss of interdependency.

Loss of interdependency is often referred to as the loss of the opportunity to marry, or the loss of shared family income. The principle behind this type of claim is that, had the victim not been subjected to abuse, they would not have lost their opportunity to form a relationship that could be expected to produce financial benefits.

In the case of Reekie v. Messervey, the Court was asked to assess the damages of a 21-year-old woman who was rendered paraplegic after a motorcycle crash. To do so, the Court considered the following evidence:

  • The injured Plaintiff’s prospects to obtain the financial benefits of marriage had been reduced because of her injuries
  • At the time of the trial, 91% of all Canadian women married at least once
  • It is less expensive to live as a married couple than as two single people
  • The plaintiff’s chances of marriage were reduced as a result of the catastrophic injuries she had sustained in the crash.

The trial judge ultimately awarded $50,000 to the injured Plaintiff as a result of her injury-related loss of opportunity. This award was upheld by the B.C. Court of Appeal.

In more recent cases, including Wilhelmson v. Dumma and Hodgins v. Street, the Court held that a Plaintiff is only required to establish that there is a real and substantial possibility that their ability to enter into a permanent relationship has been impaired in order to qualify for this head of damage. In the Wilhelmson case, the Court valued the plaintiff’s loss of interdependent relationship claim at $325,000.

A review of case law underscores the importance of presenting proper evidence to the Court when seeking compensation for a loss of interdependency. The Plaintiff must establish that their chances of forming or preserving a shared living relationship were detrimentally impacted by the injuries sustained. The Plaintiff must also present evidence to substantiate that the shared living relationship would have been economically advantageous to them. This evidentiary requirement can typically be satisfied through the use of statistical, economic, and actuarial evidence that the Plaintiff’s loss of interdependent relationship has actually resulted in a net financial loss.

While there is now judicial clarity and development of this head of damage, there are many considerations for counsel to consider when advancing the claim on behalf of clients.

If you have been or are being sexually abused, or if you know someone who is being sexually abused, it is important to get help. To discuss your situation and receive case-specific feedback, contact us today to receive a cost-free, no-obligation, confidential consultation.

This article was written by Kalin Stoykov.

 
Call us now at
1-800-JUSTICE
®

151 Eglinton Ave W,
Toronto, ON
M4R 1A6
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
4145 N Service Rd
Burlington, ON
L7L 4X6
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
2 County Ct Blvd #400,
Brampton, ON
L6W 3W8
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
105 Consumers Drive
Whitby, ON
L1N 1C4
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
92 Caplan Ave #121,
Barrie, ON
L4N 0Z7
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
380 Wellington St Tower B, 6th Floor,
London, ON
N6A 5B5
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
2233 Argentia Rd Suite 302,
East Tower Mississauga, ON
L5N 6A6
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
1 Hunter St E,
Hamilton, ON
L8N 3W1
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
459 George St N,
Peterborough, ON
K9H 3R9
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
22 Frederick Street,
Suite 700
Kitchener, ON N2H 6M6
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
116 Lisgar Street, Suite 300
Ottawa ON
K2P 0C2
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
10 Milner Business Ct #300,
Scarborough, ON
M1B 3C6
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
*consultation offices

DISCLAIMER: Please be advised that the header image and other images throughout this website may include both lawyer and non-lawyer/paralegal employees of Preszler Injury Lawyers and DPJP Professional Corporation and unrelated third parties. Our spokesperson John Fraser, or any other non-lawyer/paralegals in our marketing is not to be construed in any way as misleading to the public. Our marketing efforts are not intended to suggest qualitative superiority to other lawyers, paralegals or law firms in any way. Any questions regarding the usage of non-lawyers in our legal marketing or otherwise can be directed to our management team. Please also note that past results are not indicative of future results and that each case is unique and that case results listed on site are from experiences across Canada and are not specific to any province. Please be advised that some of the content on this website may be out of date. None of the content is intended to act as legal advice as each situation is independent and unique and requires individual legal advice from a licensed lawyer or paralegal. For legal advice on your individual situation – we can provide legal guidance after you have contacted our firm and we have established a lawyer-client relationship contractually. Maximum contingency fee charged is 33%. Finally, our usage of awards and logos for awards does not suggest qualitative superiority to other lawyers, paralegals or law firms. All awards received from third party organizations have been done so through their own reasonable evaluative process and do not include any payment for these awards except for the use of the award logos for our marketing assets. We are also proud to service additional provinces like Alberta, British Columbia and Nova Scotia.