Ontario Personal Injury Lawyers
Call 1-888-404-5167
Preszler Injury Lawyers

Discovery Transcripts in Long-Term Disability Cases


Before a personal-injury lawsuit in Ontario goes to trial, the parties engage in discovery. Discovery is a process by which the parties share information and evidence with each other to encourage a settlement and avoid “trial by surprise”—the sort of unanticipated evidence or witnesses that make fictional lawsuits so entertaining.

Normally, the materials shared in discovery in one case cannot be used in another case, but there are exceptions. A recent case decided by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (called Loccident v. State Farm) involved one such exception. In that case, the master ordered the plaintiff to share his long term disability discovery transcript with his accident-benefits insurer.

A master, or case management master, is a judicial official who helps the judge in a case by resolving certain issues—like discovery disputes—in an Ontario lawsuit.

What is a discovery transcript and how might Loccident matter for you? Read on to find out!

Disability Claims vs. Injury Claims

Talk With Our Legal Team



If you have any questions and would like to schedule a call with our legal team for a FREE no-obligation consultation, contact us now. During this call you can ask any questions as it relates to your accident and/or claim and we'll discuss your options and possible outcomes.

Regardless of where you're located in Ontario – we may be able to help you. Don't delay - call us. Our lines are open 24/7.

Before we get to the meat of this post, we should clarify an important point: An injury that causes a person to become disabled may give rise to several distinct legal claims, including:

  • A disability claim against a disability insurer;
  • If the injury was caused by another person’s wrongful act, a tort claim against that person; and
  • If the injury occurred as the result of an automobile accident, a Statutory Accident Benefits claim against the injured person’s own auto insurer.

Each of these claims could be pursued in a separate legal action, and each of those actions could have a separate discovery process. That’s what happened in Loccident: State Farm, the plaintiff’s automobile insurer, wanted him to produce the discovery transcript from an earlier claim he brought against his long-term disability insurer.

Alternatively, an injured person might be able to consolidate those claims into a single lawsuit, as we recently explained.

Discovery and Discovery Transcripts

In Ontario, discovery is governed by the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure. Those rules set out the basics for how a case proceeds through the courts, including how the discovery process works. In general, the rules refer to five types of discovery:

  • Discovery of documents
  • Examination for discovery
  • Inspection of property (such as, e.g., a car part alleged to have caused an accident)
  • Medical examination of a party whose physical or mental condition is in question in the case
  • Discovery by written questions

In an examination for discovery, the lawyer for one party will ask questions of the other party, which the other party will be required to answer. Although the examination occurs outside of court, the party answering questions is placed under oath, just like when testifying before a judge.

Everything that’s said during an examination for discovery is recorded by a court reporter. The reporter then turns that record into a written document, called the transcript or discovery transcript. Under Rule 31.11, the questions and answers in a discovery transcript can be admitted as evidence at trial if necessary.

Loccident v. State Farm: Using Long-Term Disability Discovery Transcripts in a Related Injury Case

Call 1-888-608-2111 for available options or Book a Consultation

Another rule is called the Deemed Undertaking Rule. It explains when and how evidence or information obtained through discovery in one case can be used in another.

In general, the Deemed Undertaking Rule says that such evidence or information can only be used in the case in which it was obtained. But it then lists several exceptions to this restriction. Under those exceptions, evidence or information obtained through discovery in one case can be used in another when:

  • The person who disclosed the evidence consents to the use
  • The evidence was filed with the court or given or referred to during a hearing
  • The evidence is used to impeach the testimony of a witness in the other case
  • The case in which the evidence was obtained is dismissed and then re-filed
  • The judge in the other case is satisfied that the interest of justice outweighs any prejudice that would result to the party who disclosed the evidence

In Loccident, the master determined that the third and fifth exception above applied to State Farm’s request for the plaintiff’s long-term disability discovery transcript. He explained that because “[t]he claims are overlapping and arise from the same accident,” State Farm had shown that the interest of justice outweighed any prejudice that would result from the plaintiff’s production of his discovery transcripts.

Why Does Loccident Matter?

The ability of an accident-benefits insurer to obtain the discovery transcript from a long-term disability claim affects injured plaintiffs in two ways:

  • The Deemed Undertaking Rule is meant to protect parties’ privacy even as they engage in the generally public litigation process. The exceptions to the rule strip that privacy protection when they apply.
  • Pursuing different types of claims against different insurers will usually involve distinct issues and may entail different strategies. Making the discovery transcript from one case available to defendants in later cases forces the plaintiff to think ahead about his or her strategy in both cases. This might lead him or her to, for example, contest an issue that he or she would otherwise concede, potentially delaying resolution of the first case.

Ultimately, what Loccident shows is that injured Ontarians need to work with an experienced Ontario long-term disability and personal-injury lawyer from the outset with their legal claims. A lawyer may be able to help the injured person develop a comprehensive strategy for dealing with all potential claims and pursue them effectively.

related videos


 

Disabilities That May Warrant Disability Claims
 

Filing a Disability Claim
 

What to do If Denied Disability Benefits
 
Call us now at
1-800-JUSTICE
®

151 Eglinton Ave W,
Toronto, ON
M4R 1A6
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
4145 N Service Rd
Burlington, ON
L7L 4X6
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
2 County Ct Blvd #400,
Brampton, ON
L6W 3W8
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
105 Consumers Drive
Whitby, ON
L1N 1C4
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
92 Caplan Ave #121,
Barrie, ON
L4N 0Z7
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
380 Wellington St Tower B, 6th Floor,
London, ON
N6A 5B5
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
2233 Argentia Rd Suite 302,
East Tower Mississauga, ON
L5N 6A6
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
1 Hunter St E,
Hamilton, ON
L8N 3W1
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
459 George St N,
Peterborough, ON
K9H 3R9
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
22 Frederick Street,
Suite 700
Kitchener, ON N2H 6M6
Fax: 1-855-364-7027
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
352 Elgin Street,
Ottawa ON
K2P 1M8
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
10 Milner Business Ct #300,
Scarborough, ON
M1B 3C6
Toll Free: 1-888-608-2111
*consultation offices

DISCLAIMER: Please be advised that the header image and other images throughout this website may include both lawyer and non-lawyer/paralegal employees of Preszler Injury Lawyers and DPJP Professional Corporation and unrelated third parties. Our spokesperson John Fraser, or any other non-lawyer/paralegals in our marketing is not to be construed in any way as misleading to the public. Our marketing efforts are not intended to suggest qualitative superiority to other lawyers, paralegals or law firms in any way. Any questions regarding the usage of non-lawyers in our legal marketing or otherwise can be directed to our management team. Please also note that past results are not indicative of future results and that each case is unique. Please be advised that some of the content on this website may be out of date. None of the content is intended to act as legal advice as each situation is independent and unique and requires individual legal advice from a licensed lawyer or paralegal. For legal advice on your individual situation – we can provide legal guidance after you have contacted our firm and we have established a lawyer-client relationship contractually. Maximum contingency fee charged is 33%. Finally, our usage of awards and logos for awards does not suggest qualitative superiority to other lawyers, paralegals or law firms. All awards received from third party organizations have been done so through their own reasonable evaluative process and do not include any payment for these awards except for the use of the award logos for our marketing assets.